[Numpy-discussion] GPU Numpy
Fri Aug 21 19:30:12 CDT 2009
Agreed! What would be the best name? Our package will provide non-pythonic
bindings to cuda (e.g. import cuda; cuda.cudaMemcpy( ... ) ) and some numpy
sugar (e.g. from cuda import sugar; sugar.fft.fftconvolve(ndarray_a,
How about cuda-ctypes or ctypes-cuda? Any suggestion?
At the same time we may wait for Nvidia to unlock this Driver/Runtime issue,
so we don't need this anymore.
2009/8/21 Stéfan van der Walt <email@example.com>
> 2009/8/21 Nicolas Pinto <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > For those of you who are interested, we forked python-cuda recently and
> > started to add some numpy "sugar". The goal of python-cuda is to
> > *complement* PyCuda by providing an equivalent to the CUDA Runtime API
> > (understand: not Pythonic) using automatically-generated ctypes bindings.
> > With it you can use CUBLAS, CUFFT and the emulation mode (so you don't
> > a GPU to develop):
> > http://github.com/npinto/python-cuda/tree/master
> Since you forked the project, it may be worth giving it a new name.
> PyCuda vs. python-cuda is bound to confuse people horribly!
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
Ph.D. Candidate, Brain & Computer Sciences
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion