[Numpy-discussion] Fast threading solution thoughts
Thu Feb 12 07:55:20 CST 2009
2009/2/12 Gregor Thalhammer <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Brian Granger schrieb:
>>> I am curious: would you know what would be different in numpy's case
>>> compared to matlab array model concerning locks ? Matlab, up to
>>> recently, only spreads BLAS/LAPACK on multi-cores, but since matlab 7.3
>>> (or 7.4), it also uses multicore for mathematical functions (cos,
>>> etc...). So at least in matlab's model, it looks like it can be useful.
>> Good point. Is it possible to tell what array size it switches over
>> to using multiple threads? Also, do you happen to iknow how Matlab is
>> doing this?
> Recent Matlab versions use Intels Math Kernel Library, which performs
> automatic multi-threading - also for mathematical functions like sin
> etc, but not for addition, multiplication etc. It seems to me Matlab
> itself does not take care of multi-threading. On
> you can have a look at the performance data of the MKL vectorized math
> functions. Around a vector length between 100-1000, depending on which
> function, precision, cpu architecture, they switch to multi-threading.
For BLAS level 3, the MKL is parallelized (so matrix multiplication is).
Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
Blogs: http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
More information about the Numpy-discussion