[Numpy-discussion] coding style: citations
Stéfan van der Walt
Sun Jan 11 15:13:01 CST 2009
2009/1/11 Alan G Isaac <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> The docstring standard at
> suggests a citation reference format that is not compatible
> with reStructuredText. Quoting from
> Citations are identical to footnotes except that they use
> only non-numeric labels such as [note] or [GVR2001].
> In other words, the standard currently promotes a conflation of
> notes and citations.
Thank you for your feedback. Yes, this is a problem. In a way,
RestructuredText is partially to blame for not providing numerical
citation markup. If we can come up with a good way of generating the
reference keys, we can still change the current format.
Maybe the library you mention below can automatically generate such
keys? I'd like to take that responsibility away from documentation
writers, since it is not always obvious how to generate consistent
> Another reason for avoiding the style currently in the docstring
> standard is that it renders impossible the generation of citations
> using a citation database. (See e.g. the bibtext-like facilities offered
> by bibstuff's bib4txt (http://code.google.com/p/bibstuff/).
> Alan Isaac
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
More information about the Numpy-discussion