[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numexpr 1.1, an efficient array evaluator
Mon Jan 19 14:04:21 CST 2009
A Sunday 18 January 2009, email@example.com escrigué:
> Francesc Alted wrote:
> > > > Numexpr is a fast numerical expression evaluator for NumPy.
> > > > With it, expressions that operate on arrays (like "3*a+4*b")
> > > > are accelerated and use less memory than doing the same
> > > > calculation in Python.
> > >
> > > Please pardon my ignorance as I know this project has been around
> > > for a while. It this looks very exciting, but either it's
> > > cumbersome, or I'm not understanding exactly what's being fixed.
> > > If you can accelerate evaluation, why not just integrate the
> > > faster math into numpy, rather than having two packages? Or is
> > > this something that is only an advantage when the expression is
> > > given as a string (and why is that the case)? It would be
> > > helpful if you could put the answer on your web page and in your
> > > standard release blurb in some compact form. I guess what I'm
> > > really looking for when I read one of those is a quick answer to
> > > the question "should I look into this?".
> > Well, there is a link in the project page to the "Overview" section
> > of the wiki, but perhaps is a bit hidden. I've added some blurb as
> > you suggested in the main page an another link to the "Overview"
> > wiki page. Hope that, by reading the new blurb, you can see why it
> > accelerates expression evaluation with regard to NumPy. If not,
> > tell me and will try to come with something more comprehensible.
> I did see the overview. The addition you made is great but it's so
> far down that many won't get to it. Even in its section, the meat of
> it is below three paragraphs that most users won't care about and
> many won't understand. I've posted some notes on writing intros in
> In the following, I've reordered the page to address the questions of
> potential users first, edited it a bit, and fixed the example to
> conform to our doc standards (and 128->256; hope that was right).
> See what you think...
That's great! I've heavily changed the docs on the project site. I've
followed your advices in most of places, but not always (a `Building`
section has to be always high on a manual, IMHO).
Thanks a lot for your contribution!
More information about the Numpy-discussion