[Numpy-discussion] List of Lists in C
Mon Jan 26 02:47:25 CST 2009
Yes fair point, but when it's a empty list and new elements are replaced
with a new list instance it's fine, especially as []*100000 is
significantly faster than [ for i in xrange(100000)] as I was previously
In fact I think that's partly answered my question []*x must create a list
of pointers pointing at the same list. Rather than [ for i in
xrange(100000)] which must create a list of new separate lists instances.
Hence the significant difference in speed.
2009/1/26 Matthieu Brucher <email@example.com>
> Don't remember that you are using the same list in each element of the
> outer list. If you don't want this, use [ for i in range(5)]. I
> don't think there is another way in C either (or too complicated).
> 2009/1/26 Hanni Ali <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > Hi,
> > Quick question, I've been doing a fair bit of extension writing in C
> > recently, but wondered how best to implement:
> >>>> l = [] * 5
> > to create a list of a given length containing the initialization variable
> > desired.
> > A loop seems the straight forward manner, but I would have thought there
> > a more efficient way...
> > Currently I just do it in Python and pass through the already initialized
> > list as it seems perfectly efficient.
> > Cheers,
> > Hanni
> > _______________________________________________
> > Numpy-discussion mailing list
> > Numpyemail@example.com
> > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
> Website: http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
> Blogs: http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion