[Numpy-discussion] matrix default to column vector?
Charles R Harris
Sat Jun 6 15:32:46 CDT 2009
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Alan G Isaac <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 6/6/2009 2:58 PM Charles R Harris apparently wrote:
> > How about the common expression
> > exp((v.t*A*v)/2)
> > do you expect a matrix exponential here?
> I take your point that there are conveniences
> to treating a 1 by 1 matrix as a scalar.
> Most matrix programming languages do this, I think.
> For sure GAUSS does. The result of x' * A * x
> is a "matrix" (it has one row and one column) but
> it functions like a scalar (and even more,
> since right multiplication by it is also allowed).
It's actually an inner product and the notation <x, A*x> would be
technically correct. More generally, it is a bilinear function of two
vectors. But the correct notation is a bit cumbersome for a student
struggling with plain old matrices ;)
Ndarrays are actually closer to the tensor ideal in that M*v would be a
contraction removing two indices from a three index tensor product. The
"dot" function, aka *, then functions as a contraction. In this case x.T*A*x
works just fine because A*x is 1D and x.T=x, so the final result is a scalar
(0D array). So making vectors 1D arrays would solve some problems. There
remains the construction v*v.T, which should really be treated as a tensor
product, or bivector.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion