[Numpy-discussion] performance matrix multiplication vs. matlab
Mon Jun 8 09:40:15 CDT 2009
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:55 AM, David Cournapeau <
> I think it depends on what you are doing - EM is used for 'real' work
> too, after all :)
Certainly, but EM is really just a mediocre gradient descent/hill climbing
algorithm that is relatively easy to implement.
Thanks for the link, I was not aware of this work. What is the
> difference between the ECG method and the method proposed by Lange in
>  ? To avoid 'local trapping' of the parameter in EM methods,
> recursive EM  may also be a promising method, also it seems to me
> that it has not been used so much, but I may well be wrong (I have seen
> several people using a simplified version of it without much theoretical
> consideration in speech processing).
I hung-out in the machine learning community appx. 1999-2007 and thought the
Salakhutdinov work was extremely refreshing to see after listening to no end
of papers applying EM to whatever was the hot topic at the time. :) I've
certainly seen/heard about various fixes to EM, but I haven't seen
convincing reason(s) to prefer it over proper gradient descent/hill climbing
algorithms (besides its present-ability and ease of implementation).
Research Scientist, ITA Software
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion