[Numpy-discussion] [Announce] Numpy 1.3.0b1
Robert Pyle
rpyle@post.harvard....
Thu Mar 19 10:17:43 CDT 2009
Hi,
First of all, thanks to everyone for all the hard work.
On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:43 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of the first beta for numpy
> 1.3.0. You can find source tarballs and installers for both Mac OS X
I'm on a dual G5 Mac running OS X 10.5.6 and Enthought's EPD python:
Python 2.5.2 |EPD Py25 4.1.30101| (r252:60911, Dec 19 2008,
15:28:32)
I deleted my old numpy, downloaded the Mac .dmg file and went through
what claimed to be a successful installation, only to find no numpy.
I tracked the new version down to /Library/Python/2.5/site-packages, a
directory that I didn't know existed (site-packages is the only thing
there). So I downloaded the source tarball and installed in the usual
way with no problem into
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/4.1.30101/lib/python2.5/
site-packages/
So my question is, why did the Mac .mkpg installer put numpy in the
wrong place?
I'm getting one test failure with 1.3.0b1 ---
FAIL: test_umath.TestComplexFunctions.test_loss_of_precision(<type
'numpy.complex256'>,)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/4.1.30101/lib/
python2.5/site-packages/nose-0.10.3.0001-py2.5.egg/nose/case.py", line
182, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/4.1.30101/lib/
python2.5/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/test_umath.py", line 498, in
check_loss_of_precision
check(x_series, 2*eps)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/4.1.30101/lib/
python2.5/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/test_umath.py", line 480, in
check
assert np.all(d < rtol), (np.argmax(d), x[np.argmax(d)], d.max())
AssertionError: (0, nan, nan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Pyle
Cambridge, MA
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list