[Numpy-discussion] Win32 MSI
F. David del Campo Hill
delcampo@stats.ox.ac...
Wed Mar 25 07:50:27 CDT 2009
Dear David,
I did not have any problems in extracting the three EXE installers (numpy-1.3.0b1-nosse.exe, numpy-1.3.0b1-sse2.exe, numpy-1.3.0b1-sse3.exe) from the superpack (7zip can do that with a right-click), it is when I tried to extract the files inside the per-arch installers that I realized they did not have MSI packages inside and I could not go any further. So, yes, if the three architecture installers were MSI files, that would solve my problems as I would be able to extract and install them separately.
Also (and pardon me if this is a stupid question), wouldn't the non-SSE installer work anywhere (albeit more slowly)?
Thanks,
David
-----Original Message-----
From: numpy-discussion-bounces@scipy.org [mailto:numpy-discussion-bounces@scipy.org] On Behalf Of David Cournapeau
Sent: 25 March 2009 12:19
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Win32 MSI
Hi Davie,
F. David del Campo Hill wrote:
> Sometimes, EXE setup packages are just MSI packages wrapped in an EXE file, that is why I tried to extract the files from your superpack (without luck).
>
Currently, with the superpack installer, the individual per arch
installers can be extracted easily from the command line. If the
superpack used MSI internally, would that solve your problem ? I am
worried about distributing the per arch msi directly, but someone who
would extract the msi from the super pack installer would be a
power-user/administrator,
cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list