[Numpy-discussion] element wise help
josef.pktd@gmai...
josef.pktd@gmai...
Thu May 7 14:39:43 CDT 2009
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Chris Colbert <sccolbert@gmail.com> wrote:
> the user of the program inputs the transform in a text field. So I have no
> way of know the function apriori.
>
> that doesn't mean I still couldn't throw the exec and eval commands into
> another function just to clean things up.
>
> Chris
No, I think this is ok then, it is similar to what sympy.lambdify
does. Now you call exec only twice, which might have been the main
slowdown in the loop version.
In this case, users need to write vectorized transform functions that
handle the full n x t array.
Josef
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Chris Colbert <sccolbert@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > alright I got it working. Thanks!
>> >
>> > This version is an astonishingly 1900x faster than my original
>> > implementation which had two for loops. Both versions are below:
>> >
>> > thanks again!
>> >
>> > ### new fast code ####
>> >
>> > b = 4.7
>> > n = arange(1, N+1, 1.0).reshape(N, -1)
>> > n1 = (-1)**n
>> > prefix = exp(b) / timearray
>> >
>> > arg1 = {'S': b / timearray}
>> > exec('from numpy import *', arg1)
>> > term1 = (0.5) * eval(transform, arg1)
>> >
>> > temp1 = b + (1J * pi * n)
>> > temp2 = temp1 / timearray
>> > arg2 = {'S': temp2}
>> > exec('from numpy import *', arg2)
>> > term2 = (eval(transform, arg2) * n1).sum(axis=0).real
>> >
>> > f = prefix * (term1 + term2)
>> >
>> > return f
>>
>> If you don't do code generation and have control over transform, then,
>> I think, it would be more readable to replace the exec and eval by a
>> function call to transform.
>>
>> I haven't found a case yet where eval is necessary, except for code
>> generation as in sympy.
>>
>> Josef
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > ##### old slow code ######
>> > b = 4.7
>> > f = []
>> >
>> > for t in timearray:
>> > rsum = 0.0
>> > for n in range(1, N+1):
>> > arg1 = {'S': ((b/t) + (1J*n*pi/t))}
>> > exec('from numpy import *', arg1)
>> > tempval = eval(transform, arg1)*((-1)**n)
>> > rsum = rsum + tempval.real
>> > arg2 = {'S': b/t}
>> > exec('from numpy import *', arg2)
>> > tempval2 = eval(transform, arg2)*0.5
>> > fval = (exp(b) / t) * (tempval2 + rsum)
>> > f.append(fval)
>> >
>> > return f
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Chris Colbert <sccolbert@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> its part of a larger program for designing PID controllers. This
>> >> particular function numerical calculates the inverse laplace transform
>> >> using
>> >> riemann sums.
>> >>
>> >> The exec statements, from what i gather, allow the follow eval
>> >> statement
>> >> to be executed in the scope of numpy and its functions. I don't get how
>> >> it
>> >> works either, but it doesnt work without it.
>> >>
>> >> I've just about got something working using broadcasting and will post
>> >> it
>> >> soon.
>> >>
>> >> chris
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:37 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Chris Colbert <sccolbert@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > let me just post my code:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > t is the time array and n is also an array.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > For every value of time t, these operations are performed on the
>> >>> > entire
>> >>> > array n. Then, n is summed to a scalar which represents the system
>> >>> > response
>> >>> > at time t.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I would like to eliminate this for loop if possible.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Chris
>> >>> >
>> >>> > #### code ####
>> >>> >
>> >>> > b = 4.7
>> >>> > f = []
>> >>> > n = arange(1, N+1, 1)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > for t in timearray:
>> >>> > arg1 = {'S': ((b/t) + (1J*n*pi/t))}
>> >>> > exec('from numpy import *', arg1)
>> >>> > tempval = eval(transform, arg1)*((-1)**n)
>> >>> > rsum = tempval.real.sum()
>> >>> > arg2 = {'S': b/t}
>> >>> > exec('from numpy import *', arg2)
>> >>> > tempval2 = eval(transform, arg2)*0.5
>> >>> > fval = (exp(b) / t) * (tempval2 + rsum)
>> >>> > f.append(fval)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > #### /code #####
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't understand what the exec statements are doing, I never use it.
>> >>> what is transform?
>> >>> Can you use regular functions instead or is there a special reason for
>> >>> the exec and eval?
>> >>>
>> >>> In these expressions ((b/t) + (1J*n*pi/t)), (exp(b) / t)
>> >>> broadcasting can be used.
>> >>>
>> >>> Whats the size of t and n?
>> >>>
>> >>> Josef
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Numpy-discussion mailing list
>> >>> Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
>> >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Numpy-discussion mailing list
>> > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Numpy-discussion mailing list
>> Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list