[Numpy-discussion] Solaris Sparc build broken

David Cournapeau cournape@gmail....
Fri Nov 6 12:41:28 CST 2009


On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:

> IANAL, plus I have always found the LPGL a bit confusing as opposed to the
> other licenses.

I was not so concerned about LGPL itself, but rather whether my code
constitutes derivative work. I don't think LGPL has much meaning for
python code, especially pure python code (and m4 for that matter) - I
think it should be considered the same as GPL for all practical
purpose.

David


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list