[Numpy-discussion] numpydoc without autosummary

Michael Droettboom mdroe@stsci....
Fri Oct 23 14:47:56 CDT 2009


Done.  Issue #50.

Thanks,
Mike

On 10/23/2009 02:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> The proper thing to do is file an "enhancement" ticket, at:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pydocweb/issues/list
>
> Thanks.
>
> DG
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe@stsci.edu 
> <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>> wrote:
>
>     On 10/23/2009 09:39 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>     > Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:25:12 -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>     >
>     >> Is there a way to use numpydoc without putting an autosummary
>     table at
>     >> the head of each class?  I'm using numpydoc primarily for the
>     >> sectionized docstring support, but the autosummaries are somewhat
>     >> overkill for my project.
>     >>
>     > Ah, you meant the stuff output by default to class docstrings.
>     Currently,
>     > there's no way to turn this off, unfortunately. It seems there
>     should be,
>     > though...
>     >
>     >
>     Exactly.  It would be great if there was a conf.py option (or
>     something)
>     to turn this off.  Thanks for considering it.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Mike
>     _______________________________________________
>     NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>     NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
>     http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20091023/f708fbef/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list