[Numpy-discussion] chebyshev polynomials
Thu Sep 24 14:31:01 CDT 2009
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 14:18, Pauli Virtanen <email@example.com> wrote:
> As a side note, should the cheby* versions of `polyval`, `polymul` etc.
> just be dropped to reduce namespace clutter? You can do the same things
> already within just class methods and arithmetic.
Just to clarify, you mean having classmethods that work on plain
arrays of Chebyshev coefficients? I'm +1 on that. I'm -1 on only
having a ChebyPoly class with instance methods, although it would be
useful to have as an adjunct to the plain routines.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the NumPy-Discussion