Mon Sep 28 09:29:30 CDT 2009
On 09/28/2009 03:15 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:07:47 +0200, Michael.Walker wrote:
>> In : f = f.transpose()
>> In : print f
>> [[1 3]
>> [2 4]]
>> as expected. I mention this because I think that it is worth knowing
>> having lost a LOT of time to it. Is it worth filing as a bug report?
> Yes. It indeed seems that in numarray, transpose() transposes the array
> This could maybe be fixed by a new numarray-emulating ndarray subclass.
> The tricky problem then is that some functions don't, IIRC, preserve
> subclasses, which may lead to surprises. (Anyway, these should be fixed
> at some point...)
> At the least, we should write a well-visible "differences to numarray"
> document that explains all differences and known bugs.
This is not a bug! This specific difference between numpy and numarray
is documented on the 'converting from numarray' page:
What actually is incorrect is that the numpy.numarray.transpose has the
same docstring as numpy.transpose. So it would be very helpful to first
correct the numpy.array.transpose documentation.
A larger goal would be to correctly document all the numpy.numarray and
numpy.numeric functions as these should not be linked to the similar
numpy functions. If these are identical then it should state that, what
differences exist and then refer to equivalent numpy page for example,
numpy.numarray.matrixmultiply and numpy.dot. Also, the documentation for
these numpy.numarray and numpy.numeric functions should state that these
are mainly included for compatibility reasons and may be removed at a
More information about the NumPy-Discussion