[Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-dev] Deprecate chararray [was Plea for help]
David Goldsmith
d.l.goldsmith@gmail....
Wed Sep 30 15:37:59 CDT 2009
So, Ralf (or anyone), how, if at all, should we modify the status of the
existing chararray objects/methods in the wiki? Assuming you have no
problem sharing them with me, Michael, I could add those docstrings you
created for the existing methods, and we can promote them to "Ready for
Review"; they can be "demoted" to "Unimportant" (by someone with the
appropriate privileges); or I can promote them to "Being written" and add a
comment that the docstring has been written, it just resides elsewhere for
the time being (however, IMO they should not be left in "Needs editing"
status).
DG
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe@stsci.edu> wrote:
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe@stsci.edu
> > <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>> wrote:
> >
> > In the source in my working copy. Is that going to cause problems?
> I
> > wasn't sure if it was possible to document methods that didn't yet
> > exist
> > in the code in the wiki.
> >
> > That is fine. New functions will automatically show up in the wiki. It
> > would be helpful though if you could mark them ready for review in the
> > wiki (if they are) after they show up. Could take up to 24 hours for
> > svn changes to propagate.
> Thanks. Will do.
> >
> > Only if you moved functions around it would be useful if you pinged
> > Pauli after you committed them. This is a temporary problem, right now
> > the wiki creates a new page for a moved object, and the old content
> > (if any) has to be copied over to the new page.
> All of the functions that were moved were previously without docstrings
> in SVN, though some had docstrings (that I just now discovered) in the
> wiki. This may cause some hiccups, I suppose, so I'll be sure to
> announce when these things get committed to SVN so I know how to help
> straighten these things out.
>
> Mike
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ralf
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > David Goldsmith wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Michael Droettboom
> > <mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>
> > > <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu <mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2) Improve documentation
> > >
> > > Every method now has a docstring, and a new page of routines
> > has been
> > > added to the Sphinx tree.
> > >
> > >
> > > Um, where did you do this, 'cause it's not showing up in the doc
> > wiki.
> > >
> > > DG
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Droettboom
> > Science Software Branch
> > Operations and Engineering Division
> > Space Telescope Science Institute
> > Operated by AURA for NASA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org>
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
>
> --
> Michael Droettboom
> Science Software Branch
> Operations and Engineering Division
> Space Telescope Science Institute
> Operated by AURA for NASA
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20090930/6b8d2c37/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list