[Numpy-discussion] Math Library

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Mon Apr 5 11:50:11 CDT 2010


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris
> >> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris
> >> >> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi All,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy
> >> >> > math
> >> >> > library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how
> we
> >> >> > should
> >> >> > organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in
> >> >> > numpy/core/src?
> >> >>
> >> >> David already did this: numpy/core/src/npymath/
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to
> >> > toss a
> >> > lot of real numerical code into it.
> >>
> >> Who cares? I don't.
> >
> > I care. I want the code to be organized.
>
> Then do it when there is code and we can see what needs to be organized.
>
>
I am writing code and I want to decide up front where to put it. I know
where you stand, so you need say no more. I'm waiting to see if other folks
have an opinion.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100405/6f98819d/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list