[Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers@googlemail....
Mon Apr 19 19:23:43 CDT 2010


On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers@googlemail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@googlemail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase <seb.haase@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I
>>> supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised
>>> that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that
>>> technically not possible ?
>>>
>>> You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not
>> succeed in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009)
>> that it has never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way
>> to get it to work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be
>> compiled against numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy
>> 1.3. The variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it
>> unworkable.
>>
>> I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is
>> to finally release.
>>
>
> To remind myself of the issue I tried building it again, and managed to
> build a 2.5 binary against numpy 1.3 on OS X at least. Can anyone tell me
> why 2.5 binaries are supposed to be built against numpy 1.2 and 2.6 binaries
> against numpy 1.3?
>
>
> It seems I've crawled a bit further up the learning curve since last time I
tried. Scipy binaries for python 2.5 (built against numpy 1.2) are now on
Sourceforge, please test them.

Cheers,
Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100420/7ee8c295/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list