[Numpy-discussion] My GSoC Proposal to Implement a Subset of NumPy for PyPy
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Wed Apr 21 07:21:48 CDT 2010
Dan Roberts wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. You're certainly right that your work is
> extremely beneficial to mine. At present I'm afraid a great deal of
> NumPy C code isn't easily reusable and it's great you're addressing
> that. I may not have been thinking in line with Maciej, but I was
> thinking ufuncs would be written in pure Python and jit compiled to an
> efficient form. (We can make lots of nice assumptions about them) That
> said, I think being able to write generic ufuncs is a very good idea,
> and absolutely doable.
This might be relevant?
More information about the NumPy-Discussion