[Numpy-discussion] My GSoC Proposal to Implement a Subset of NumPy for PyPy

Dag Sverre Seljebotn dagss@student.matnat.uio...
Wed Apr 21 07:21:48 CDT 2010


Dan Roberts wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.  You're certainly right that your work is 
> extremely beneficial to mine.  At present I'm afraid a great deal of 
> NumPy C code isn't easily reusable and it's great you're addressing 
> that.  I may not have been thinking in line with Maciej, but I was 
> thinking ufuncs would be written in pure Python and jit compiled to an 
> efficient form.  (We can make lots of nice assumptions about them) That 
> said, I think being able to write generic ufuncs is a very good idea, 
> and absolutely doable.

This might be relevant?

http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_16/

-- 
Dag Sverre


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list