[Numpy-discussion] My GSoC Proposal to Implement a Subset of NumPy for PyPy

René Dudfield renesd@gmail....
Fri Apr 23 08:20:03 CDT 2010


On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
dagss@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:

> Dan Roberts wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.  You're certainly right that your work is
> > extremely beneficial to mine.  At present I'm afraid a great deal of
> > NumPy C code isn't easily reusable and it's great you're addressing
> > that.  I may not have been thinking in line with Maciej, but I was
> > thinking ufuncs would be written in pure Python and jit compiled to an
> > efficient form.  (We can make lots of nice assumptions about them) That
> > said, I think being able to write generic ufuncs is a very good idea,
> > and absolutely doable.
>
> This might be relevant?
>
> http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_16/
>
> --
> Dag Sverre
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>


Also this:
    http://numcorepy.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100423/9cd4e42f/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list