[Numpy-discussion] My GSoC Proposal to Implement a Subset of NumPy for PyPy
Fri Apr 23 08:20:03 CDT 2010
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
> Dan Roberts wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply. You're certainly right that your work is
> > extremely beneficial to mine. At present I'm afraid a great deal of
> > NumPy C code isn't easily reusable and it's great you're addressing
> > that. I may not have been thinking in line with Maciej, but I was
> > thinking ufuncs would be written in pure Python and jit compiled to an
> > efficient form. (We can make lots of nice assumptions about them) That
> > said, I think being able to write generic ufuncs is a very good idea,
> > and absolutely doable.
> This might be relevant?
> Dag Sverre
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion