[Numpy-discussion] NumPy-Discussion Digest, Vol 47, Issue 61
Sat Aug 21 18:12:50 CDT 2010
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 17:58, David Goldsmith <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:30:58 -0500
>> From: Robert Kern <email@example.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making MATLAB and Python "play nice"
>> To: Discussion of Numerical Python <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:25, David Goldsmith <email@example.com>
>> > Hi! ?Please forgive the re-post: I forgot to change the subject line
>> > and I haven't seen a response to this yet, so I'm assuming the former
>> > might be the cause of the latter.
>> Or perhaps because the licenses are plainly visible at the links?
> Ah, I see: if I can't be bothered to click on the links, no one else can be
> bothered to tell me that that's all I need to do to get my question
Well, the real reason you didn't get a response is most likely the
usual: no one got around to it, or lost track of it. Though responding
to the digest is not helping you now.
> Unfortunately, the solutions are useless to me if they're not
> freely redistributable, so I have no incentive to click on the links--which
> do not advertise that they answer the licensing question--
It's pretty standard these days for home pages of software to contain
the license information. No one needs to advertise that any more.
> 'til that question
> is answered - catch-22.
Do you really think that "actually solving the problem you posed" is
not enough of an incentive to do the minimal action of clicking a link
and reading a little? Hell, answering the question "Are they
redistributable?" is incentive to click the links. It's faster and
easier than posting to the list.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the NumPy-Discussion