[Numpy-discussion] Removing datetime support for 1.4.x series ?
Charles R Harris
Thu Feb 4 00:50:06 CST 2010
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Travis Oliphant <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
> A more important scenario is as follows: let's assume we do allow
> breaking the ABI every 1.X release, meaning that an ABI incompatible
> change happens every ~ 6 months at the current pace (using the last 2-3
> years as history).
> If the issue is having too many releases that are .X releases, then let's
> just slow that down. We are going to have to be able to break ABI
> compatibility at some point. I agree it should not be taken lightly.
> But, we have to allow it to happen.
> For example, there has been a change I've wanted to see in the NumPy data
> structure ever since 1.0 that I did not make precisely to avoid breaking ABI
> compatibility. The 'hasobject' field in the PyArray_Descr structure is
> too small and should be renamed. There is a comment in the code stating
> that this field needs to change as soon as we are willing to break ABI
> compatibility (and the field still hasn't changed). The comment is still
> there. Obviously I have been cautious about ABI compatibility. I just
> never had the opinion that we would *never* change the ABI.
> I don't think there is any disagreement in the general idea that the ABI
> should remain stable for a long time. I think the problem is that in this
> particular instance, we had different opinions about the importance of ABI
> compatibility for the 1.4 release. I did not think it was possible, and
> was surprised when it was attempted. I should have voiced those concerns
> more loudly.
> What about the idea of making a 1.3.1 release that maintains ABI
> compatibility with previous releases. This would basically allow for 1.X
> releases where .X is even to break ABI compatibility (not saying they always
> will, but might). The odd releases never do.
> I will help make the 1.3.1 release if this is an agreeable solution. This
> pattern would certainly help create stability while still allowing change to
> happen in a reasonable way.
1.3.1, 1.4.1, what's the difference? 1.4 is already out and causing trouble.
I don't see how another four months waiting for the datetime release is a
killer and it is still in the trunk. Why does it have to be in 1.4?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion