[Numpy-discussion] Removing datetime support for 1.4.x series ?

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Thu Feb 11 22:57:11 CST 2010


On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Darren Dale <dsdale24@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, David Cournapeau <david@silveregg.co.jp
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Charles R Harris wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, David Cournapeau <
> david@silveregg.co.jp
> >> > <mailto:david@silveregg.co.jp>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >     josef.pktd@gmail.com <mailto:josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >      > scipy is relatively easy to compile, I was thinking also of
> h5py,
> >> >      > pytables and pymc (b/c of pytables), none of them are importing
> >> > with
> >> >      > numpy 1.4.0 because of the cython issue.
> >> >
> >> >     As I said, all of them will have to be regenerated with cython
> >> > 0.12.1.
> >> >     There is no other solution,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Wait, won't the structures be the same size? If they are then the
> cython
> >> > check won't fail.
> >>
> >> Yes, but the structures are bigger (even after removing the datetime
> >> stuff, I had the cython warning when I did some tests).
> >>
> >
> > That's curious. It sounds like it isn't ABI compatible yet. Any idea of
> what
> > was added? It would be helpful if the cython message gave a bit more
> > information...
>
> Could it be related to __array_prepare__?
>

Didn't __array_prepare__  go into 1.3? Did you add anything to a structure?

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100211/a071d4d8/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list