[Numpy-discussion] Removing datetime support for 1.4.x series ?

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Thu Feb 11 23:14:42 CST 2010


On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Darren Dale <dsdale24@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Darren Dale <dsdale24@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, David Cournapeau
> >> > <david@silveregg.co.jp>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Charles R Harris wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, David Cournapeau
> >> >> > <david@silveregg.co.jp
> >> >> > <mailto:david@silveregg.co.jp>> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >     josef.pktd@gmail.com <mailto:josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >      > scipy is relatively easy to compile, I was thinking also of
> >> >> > h5py,
> >> >> >      > pytables and pymc (b/c of pytables), none of them are
> >> >> > importing
> >> >> > with
> >> >> >      > numpy 1.4.0 because of the cython issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >     As I said, all of them will have to be regenerated with cython
> >> >> > 0.12.1.
> >> >> >     There is no other solution,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Wait, won't the structures be the same size? If they are then the
> >> >> > cython
> >> >> > check won't fail.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, but the structures are bigger (even after removing the datetime
> >> >> stuff, I had the cython warning when I did some tests).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > That's curious. It sounds like it isn't ABI compatible yet. Any idea
> of
> >> > what
> >> > was added? It would be helpful if the cython message gave a bit more
> >> > information...
> >>
> >> Could it be related to __array_prepare__?
> >
> > Didn't __array_prepare__  go into 1.3? Did you add anything to a
> structure?
>
> No, it was included in 1.4:
> http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/doc/release/1.4.0-notes.rst
>
> No, I don't think so. I added __array_prepare__ to array_methods[] in this
> file:
> http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/numpy/core/src/multiarray/methods.c
>
>
I don't see any struct definitions there, it looks clean.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100211/dd421d39/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list