[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions

Pierre GM pgmdevlist@gmail....
Fri Feb 12 16:30:07 CST 2010


On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:24 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> 
> OK, OK, Ok, it's not worth getting into a flame war over.  We ask people who are going to be working on the docstrings to subscribe to scipy-dev; this is not the same thing as being an "innocent bystander" asking a question or making a comment - I retract the request.
> 
> Now, does anyone have anything useful to say about OP's original second problem?

Yes: write a proper docstring, or find me a better way to automatically create the docstring of a function from the docstring of the corresponding method (or vice-versa) than we have now for numpy.ma. I agree that the current method is not ideal, but at least you get some kind of info.


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list