[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions

Pierre GM pgmdevlist@gmail....
Fri Feb 12 21:09:28 CST 2010


On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote

> Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for the function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not followed?  

The methods'  docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the corresponding function docstrings are created.



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list