[Numpy-discussion] numpy 2.0, what else to do?

Travis Oliphant oliphant@enthought....
Sat Feb 13 16:06:59 CST 2010


I clarified my vote on these topics in a follow up email to Jared's  
separating the ideas.

--
(mobile phone of)
Travis Oliphant
Enthought, Inc.
1-512-536-1057
http://www.enthought.com

On Feb 13, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Travis Oliphant <oliphant@enthought.com>  
wrote:

> -1
>
> --
> (mobile phone of)
> Travis Oliphant
> Enthought, Inc.
> 1-512-536-1057
> http://www.enthought.com
>
> On Feb 13, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Since there has been talk of deprecating the numarray and numeric
>> compatibility parts of numpy for the upcoming 2.0 release I thought
>> maybe we could consider a few other changes. First, numpy imports a
>> ton of stuff by default and this is maintained for backward
>> compatibility. Would this be a reasonable time to change that and
>> require explicit imports for things like fft? Second, Poly1D has
>> problems that aren't likely to get fixed, I would like to both
>> deprecate the old polynomial support and make it not be imported by
>> default.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Chuck
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list