[Numpy-discussion] numpy 2.0, what else to do?

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Tue Feb 16 00:21:40 CST 2010


On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:00 PM, David Cournapeau <david@silveregg.co.jp>wrote:

> Charles R Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Just to be clear, there are *already* macros in the ndarrayobject.h file
> > that aren't py3k compatible. How do you propose to fix those?
>
> I don't understand the connection with the public vs private issue. If
> the py3k compatibility header is to be shared by several extensions, it
> has to be in a different header, included separately from any numpy
> headers.
>
>
So I had the impression that the compatibility header couldn't be included
in some of the code that needed it. Is that the case.


> Fixing the ndarrayobject.h to be py3k-compatible can and should be done
> without adding extra public macros.
>

I wasn't adding extra public macros, I propose putting ifdefs around the
*current* macros so that they are compatible with py3k.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100215/a7b0ed36/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list