[Numpy-discussion] numpy 2.0, what else to do?
Charles R Harris
Tue Feb 16 00:21:40 CST 2010
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:00 PM, David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
> Charles R Harris wrote:
> > Just to be clear, there are *already* macros in the ndarrayobject.h file
> > that aren't py3k compatible. How do you propose to fix those?
> I don't understand the connection with the public vs private issue. If
> the py3k compatibility header is to be shared by several extensions, it
> has to be in a different header, included separately from any numpy
So I had the impression that the compatibility header couldn't be included
in some of the code that needed it. Is that the case.
> Fixing the ndarrayobject.h to be py3k-compatible can and should be done
> without adding extra public macros.
I wasn't adding extra public macros, I propose putting ifdefs around the
*current* macros so that they are compatible with py3k.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion