[Numpy-discussion] Building Windows binaries on OS X
Wed Feb 24 05:19:51 CST 2010
Ralf Gommers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:42 PM, David Cournapeau <email@example.com
> <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
> So here is how I see things in the near future for release:
> - compile a simple binary installer for mac os x and windows (no need
> for doc or multiple archs) from 1.4.x
> - test this with the scipy binary out there (running the full test
> suites), ideally other well known packages as well (matplotlib,
> pytables, etc...).
> - if it works for you, or you cannot easily test it, put it for wide
> testing as a basis for the 184.108.40.206 binary
> - if it works, make a RC1 for Numpy 220.127.116.11 ("full" binaries).
> I think we need to push this ASAP to recover from the current
> confusion w.r.t. binaries.
> That's a sensible plan, I'll start on it right away.
Great. Let me know of any glitch.
> Just to double-check, can the 1.4.x branch be released as-is? How about
> the version, the version scheme major.minor.micro does not allow for
> your proposed 18.104.22.168. Do you want to just drop the last .1 or make this
Yes, 1.4.1 is fine. There are a few fixes besides the ABI fix now, so no
need to complicate things further.
I think 1.4.x can serve as the basis for 1.4.1 as is. I have not checked
recently if it builds OK on MS compiler, but not much has changed.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion