[Numpy-discussion] lstsq functionality

[Skipper Seabold]

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Keith Goodman <kwgoodman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point. Looks like we can get rid of 2 copies! I didn't get rid of
> the second copy but I did cut things down just to see what the timing
> was like. I also threw out the ability to handle complex numbers (only
> saves an if iscomplex statement):

Just for timing purposes though right?