[Numpy-discussion] determinant of a scalar not handled
Skipper Seabold
jsseabold@gmail....
Mon Jul 26 18:05:34 CDT 2010
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Alan G Isaac <aisaac@american.edu> wrote:
> On 7/26/2010 12:45 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> Right now np.linalg.det does not handle scalars or 1d (scalar) arrays.
>
> I don't have a real opinion on changing this, but I am curious
> to know the use case, as the current behavior seems
Use case is just so that I can have less atleast_2d's in my code,
since checks are done in linalg.det anyway.
> a) correct and b) to provide an error check.
>
Isn't the determinant defined for a scalar b such that det(b) ==
det([b]) == det([[b]])?
The error check is redundant I think if the determinant is defined for
a scalar (if not then shouldn't det([[b]]) fail?). Check if something
is 2d. Check if something is square. Since a square array is by
definition 2d, if you replace asarray then the check for 2d with
atleast_2d, you can handle the scalar case and then go on to check if
it's square. Basically, it saves a tiny bit of time in det and saves
me from writing atleast_2d.
Skipper
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list