[Numpy-discussion] size_t or npy_intp?
Tue Jul 27 09:45:32 CDT 2010
A Tuesday 27 July 2010 15:20:47 Charles R Harris escrigué:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Francesc Alted <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a bit confused on which datatype should I use when referring to NumPy
> > ndarray lengths. In one hand I'd use `size_t` that is the canonical way
> > to refer to lengths of memory blocks. In the other hand, `npy_intp`
> > seems the standard data type used in NumPy for this.
> They have different ranges, npy_intp is signed and in later versions of
> Python is the same as Py_ssize_t, while size_t is unsigned. It would be a
> bad idea to mix the two.
Agreed that mixing the two is a bad idea. So I suppose that you are
suggesting to use `npy_intp`. But then, I'd say that `size_t` being unsigned,
is a better fit for describing a memory length.
Mmh, I'll stick with `size_t` for the time being (unless anyone else can
convince me that this is really a big mistake ;-)
More information about the NumPy-Discussion