[Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"
Vincent Davis
vincent@vincentdavis....
Sat Jun 26 17:28:02 CDT 2010
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 PM, David Goldsmith
> <d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith
>>> <d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the
>>> > numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (was) almost completely
>>> > ready for review; please focus on scipy unless/until the reason why
>>> > there
>>> > are now so many problems in numpy.stats can be determined (I suspect the
>>> > numpy.stats code has been made to call the scipy.stats.distributions
>>> > module,
>>> > and all those docstrings have been marked "Unimportant" - meaning do not
>>> > edit - either permanently, in the case of the instances, or temporarily
>>> > in
>>> > the case of the base classes from which the instances are created).
>>> >
>>> > Bottom line: if it doesn't start w/ scipy, leave it alone (for now).
>>>
>>> It's missing in several functions and incorrect docstrings have to be
>>> corrected. Look at the log of e.g. pareto in the editor, the returns
>>> have never been added, unless you find any missing revisions that are
>>> not in the doc editor.
>>>
>>> Josef
>>
>> OK, I see it was promoted to "Needs review" very early in the first Marathon
>> - before the Standard had been finalized? God help us: how many other numpy
>> docstrings are improperly at "Needs review" because of this? Scheisse,
>> numpy may not be as close to Ready For Review as we thought...
>
> Is there a chance that some changes got lost?
>
> I thought I had edited random.pareto to note that it is actually Lomax
> or Pareto II. But I'm not completely sure I actually did it, and not
> just intended to do it. I don't see any record in the doc editor, so
> maybe I never did edit it.
Also several are missing examples but this is easy (copy past) with
the tests I just added.
Vincent
>
> Josef
>
>
>>
>> DG
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list