[Numpy-discussion] Is this a bug in numpy.ma.reduce?

Friedrich Romstedt friedrichromstedt@gmail....
Mon Mar 8 13:25:15 CST 2010


It's pretty simple, but I was stunned myself how simple.  Have a look
at line 65 of your script you provided:

W = W.T

This means,  x <-> y.  But in the for loops, you still act as if W
wasn't transposed.  I added some prints, the positions should be clear
for you:

argW.shape = (320, 200)
i, j = (0, 0)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (0, 50, 0, 80)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (0, 1)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (50, 100, 0, 80)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (0, 2)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (100, 150, 0, 80)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (0, 3)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (150, 200, 0, 80)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (1, 0)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (0, 50, 80, 160)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (1, 1)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (50, 100, 80, 160)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (1, 2)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (100, 150, 80, 160)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (1, 3)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (150, 200, 80, 160)
part2plot.shape = (50, 80)
i, j = (2, 0)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (0, 50, 160, 240)
part2plot.shape = (50, 40)
i, j = (2, 1)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (50, 100, 160, 240)
part2plot.shape = (50, 40)
i, j = (2, 2)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (100, 150, 160, 240)
part2plot.shape = (50, 40)
i, j = (2, 3)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (150, 200, 160, 240)
part2plot.shape = (50, 40)
i, j = (3, 0)
j*ny/4, (j+1)*ny/4, i*nx/4, (i+1)*nx/4 = (0, 50, 240, 320)
part2plot.shape = (50, 0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\Home\Friedrich\Entwicklung\2010\David\aquarius.py", line 91, in ?
    ax.imshow(part2plot, extent = extent)
  File "D:\Programme\Programmierung\python-2.4.1\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\ax
es.py", line 5471, in imshow
    im.autoscale_None()
  File "D:\Programme\Programmierung\python-2.4.1\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\cm
.py", line 148, in autoscale_None
    self.norm.autoscale_None(self._A)
  File "D:\Programme\Programmierung\python-2.4.1\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\co
lors.py", line 682, in autoscale_None
    if self.vmin is None: self.vmin = ma.minimum(A)
  File "D:\Programme\Programmierung\python-2.4.1\lib\site-packages\numpy\ma\core
.py", line 3042, in __call__
    return self.reduce(a)
  File "D:\Programme\Programmierung\python-2.4.1\lib\site-packages\numpy\ma\core
.py", line 3057, in reduce
    t = self.ufunc.reduce(target, **kargs)
ValueError: zero-size array to ufunc.reduce without identity

So you simply have to exchange the role of x and y in your slice
indicing expression, and everything will work out fine, I suspect :-)

Or simpy leave out the transposition?  Note that in the other case,
you also may have to consider to change to extent's axes to get it
properly reflected.

NB: With my version of matplotlib, it didn't accept the colormap, but
when yours does, it doesn't matter.

Friedrich


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list