[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] Nanny, faster NaN functions
Fri Nov 19 16:18:44 CST 2010
On 11/19/10 11:19 AM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Why not make this a patch to numpy/scipy instead?
> My guess is that having separate underlying functions for each dtype,
> ndim, and axis would be a nightmare for a large project like Numpy.
1) Having special-cases for the most common cases is not such a bad idea.
2) could one use some sort of templating approach to get all the dtypes
and such that you want?
3) as for number of dimensions, I don't think to would be to hard to
generalize that -- at least for contiguous arrays.
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
More information about the NumPy-Discussion