[Numpy-discussion] Schedule for 1.5.1?
Charles R Harris
Tue Oct 5 19:12:17 CDT 2010
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
> would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
> Any Python versions:
> - #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active
> cython buffers caused undefined behavior. Breaks Sage.)
> - #1617 (Ensure complex(np.longcomplex(...)) doesn't drop the imag part)
> - Fix doc build
> Python 3 specific:
> - #1604 (//-issue in distutils; infinite loop in some cases :)
> - #1609 (dotblas was never used on Python 3)
> - #1610 (fromfile/tofile did not stay in sync with Python 3 file handle
> position -- breaks e.g. scipy.io pretty badly)
> - f2py startup script didn't run properly on Py3
> Not so many fixes so far, but I'd like to see a Numpy release with #1610
> fixed before releasing Scipy with Python 3 support. Since 2.0.0 breaks
> binary compatibility and merging the refactoring back may take some time,
> it would be nice to have another 1.5.x release.
> Ralf & c, opinions? I'd maybe suggest somewhere on the Oct/Nov axis.
Sounds good. I also have some stuff I'd like to add but won't have much time
before Nov. But whatever looks good to Ralf will work for me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion