[Numpy-discussion] limit to number of fields in recarray
Tue Aug 2 15:09:59 CDT 2011
yup, duplicate field names given. I didn't commit the non-working version and I didn't want to mess up my working code so I tried duplicating the dtype in a new file and couldn't recreate the error. I suppose the answer to my question is, there is no limit to the number of records? Must have been an invalid name, or a different error on my part. Out of curiosity, what does recarray consider an invalid field name?
On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Craig Yoshioka <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> duplicate column in dtype?
> "Duplicate field names given."? Can you post code to replicate?
>> I just consolidated some of the columns and the error went away... none had duplicate field names... hence the question.
> I don't think this would be raised unless there are duplicates. There
> is some name changing for invalid field names that could result in a
> name collision. I think I've run into this before.
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
More information about the NumPy-Discussion