Thu Aug 25 00:04:03 CDT 2011
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Anthony Scopatz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:34 PM, srean <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Anthony and Mark, this is good to know.
>> So what would be the advised way of looking at freshly baked documentation
>> ? Just look at the raw files ? or is there some place else where the correct
>> sphinx rendered docs are hosted.
> Building the docs yourself is probably the safest bet. However, someone
> should probably hook up the numpy and scipy repos to readthedocs.org. That
> would solve this problem...
Maybe someone just needs to add it here
and it would show up in numpy's own docs, which are hooked up to the
repo, as far as I know.
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Anthony Scopatz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> code-block:: is a directive that I think might be specific to sphinx.
>>> Naturally, github's renderer will drop it.
>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Mark Wiebe <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> I believe this is because of github's .rst processor which simply drops
>>>> blocks it can't understand. When building NumPy documentation, many more
>>>> extensions and context exists. I'm getting the same thing in the C-API
>>>> NA-mask documentation I just posted.
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
More information about the NumPy-Discussion