[Numpy-discussion] numpy docs dependency problem in Ubuntu
Fri Feb 11 09:59:35 CST 2011
On Friday, February 11, 2011, Benjamin Root <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011, Jouni K. Seppänen <email@example.com> wrote:
>> [Crossposting to matplotlib devel list]
>> Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:22, Barry Warsaw <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> Here's the problem: for Ubuntu, we've had to disable the building of
>>>> the numpy documentation package, because its dependencies violate
>>>> Ubuntu policy. Numpy is in our "main" archive but the documentation
>>>> depends on python-matplotlib, which lives in our "universe"
>>>> archive. Such cross archive dependencies break the build.
>>>> We can't put python-matplotlib in main because of *its* dependencies.
>>> As a digression, I think the python-matplotlib dependencies could be
>>> significantly reduced. For a number of use cases (this is one of them,
>>> but there are others), you don't need any GUI backend. Independent of
>>> this issue, it would be great to be able to install python-matplotlib
>>> in a headless server environment without pulling in all of those GUI
>>> bits. Looking at the list of the hard dependencies, I don't understand
>>> why half of them are there.
>> Would it make sense to split out each interactive backend to its own
>> Ubuntu package, e.g. python-matplotlib-tk, etc? Each of these would
>> depend on the relevant toolkit packages, and python-matplotlib would
>> have a much shorter list of dependencies.
>> Jouni K. Seppänen
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> There are a lot of advantages to this idea, and I wonder if it might
> make distributions easier and allow fuller control by the user. In
> particular, kubuntu could default to using the qt backend while
> regular ubuntu could use gym.
stupid autocorrect... Gym -> Gtk
> However, how practical is this to implement? What does it require
> from us upstream?
> Ben Root
More information about the NumPy-Discussion