[Numpy-discussion] Behaviour of ndarray and other objects with __radd__?
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris@gmail....
Wed Jun 15 10:46:50 CDT 2011
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Olivier Delalleau <shish@keba.be> wrote:
> I don't really understand this behavior either, but juste note that
> according to
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/c-info.beyond-basics.html
> "This attribute can also be defined by objects that are not sub-types of
> the ndarray"
>
> -=- Olivier
>
>
> 2011/6/15 Jonathan Taylor <jonathan.taylor@utoronto.ca>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to have objects that I can mix with ndarrays in
>> arithmetic expressions but I need my object to have control of the
>> operation even when it is on the right hand side of the equation. I
>> realize from the documentation that the way to do this is to actually
>> subclass ndarray but this is undesirable because I do not need all the
>> heavy machinery of a ndarray and I do not want users to see all of the
>> ndarray methods. Is there a way to somehow achieve these goals?
>>
>> I would also very much appreciate some clarification of what is
>> happening in the following basic example:
>>
>> import numpy as np
>> class Foo(object):
>> # THE NEXT LINE IS COMMENTED
>> # __array_priority__ = 0
>> def __add__(self, other):
>> print 'Foo has control over', other
>> return 1
>> def __radd__(self, other):
>> print 'Foo has control over', other
>> return 1
>>
>> x = np.arange(3)
>> f = Foo()
>>
>> print f + x
>> print x + f
>>
>> yields
>>
>> Foo has control over [0 1 2]
>> 1
>> Foo has control over 0
>> Foo has control over 1
>> Foo has control over 2
>> [1 1 1]
>>
>> I see that I have control from the left side as expected and I suspect
>> that what is happening in the second case is that numpy is trying to
>> "broadcast" my object onto the left side as if it was an object array?
>>
>> Now if I uncomment the line __array_priority__ = 0 I do seem to
>> accomplish my goals (see below) but I am not sure why. I am
>> surprised, given what I have read in the documentation, that
>> __array_priority__ does anything in a non subclass of ndarray.
>> Furthermore, I am even more surprised that it does anything when it is
>> 0, which is the same as ndarray.__array_priority__ from what I
>> understand. Any clarification of this would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
There's a bit of code in the ufunc implementation that checks for the
__array_priority__ attribute regardless of if the object subclasses ndarray,
probably because someone once needed to solve the same problem you are
having. The comment that goes with it is
/*
* FAIL with NotImplemented if the other object has
* the __r<op>__ method and has __array_priority__ as
* an attribute (signalling it can handle ndarray's)
* and is not already an ndarray or a subtype of the same type.
*/
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110615/1b5e056f/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list