[Numpy-discussion] feedback request: proposal to add masks to the core ndarray
Thu Jun 23 17:08:06 CDT 2011
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 17:05, Charles R Harris
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 17:02, Charles R Harris
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Gael Varoquaux
>> > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> >> Ufuncs need work, but I have
>> >> the impression that your proposal is simply to solve the special case
>> >> of
>> >> masked data in the ufunc by breaking the simple numpy array model.
>> > I wonder how much of the complication could be located in the dtype.
>> What dtype? There are no new dtypes in this proposal.
> Not yet, there aren't.
You're being cryptic. The entire point of the proposal seems to be to
*avoid* new dtypes for the purpose of handling missing data. What are
you trying to refer to?
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the NumPy-Discussion