[Numpy-discussion] feedback request: proposal to add masks to the core ndarray
Charles R Harris
Thu Jun 23 18:02:40 CDT 2011
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Mark Wiebe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Pierre GM <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:55 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Mark Wiebe <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > Enthought has asked me to look into the "missing data" problem and how
>> NumPy could treat it better. I've considered the different ideas of adding
>> dtype variants with a special signal value and masked arrays, and concluded
>> that adding masks to the core ndarray appears is the best way to deal with
>> the problem in general.
>> > I've written a NEP that proposes a particular design, viewable here:
>> Mmh, after timeseries, now masked arrays... Mark, I start to see a pattern
>> here ;)
> I think it speaks to what's on Enthought's mind, in any case. :)
What is the thinking at Enthought about this? I sense a meeting in the
background and it would be nice to know what the motivations were.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion