[Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule

Robert Kern robert.kern@gmail....
Mon Mar 7 11:23:33 CST 2011


On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:08, Christopher Barker <Chris.Barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
> On 3/6/11 5:54 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> I suppose this might cause a problem with lazy/quick c extensions that
>> expected elements in a certain order, so some breakage could occur.
>
> absolutely!
>
> (I've gotten a bit confused about this thread, but if this is about the
> question of whether structured dtypes are dtypes are assumed to always
> keep order, read on -- otherwise, ignore)..

Can someone explain exactly what changed? Or point to the changeset
that made it? It's not clear to me what operations are different under
Mark's changes.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list