[Numpy-discussion] in the NA discussion, what can we agree on?
Thu Nov 3 21:54:18 CDT 2011
For the non-destructive+propagating case, do I understand correctly that
this would mean I (as a user) could temporarily decide to IGNORE certain
portions of my data, perform a series of computation on that data, and the
IGNORED flag (or however it is implemented) would be propagated from
computation to computation? If that's the case, I suspect I'd use it all
the time ... to effectively perform data subsetting without generating
(partial) copies of large datasets. But maybe I misunderstand the
intended notion of propagation ...
> Or put another way, do you think that the MISSING and IGNORED concepts
> are adequate to cover practical use cases, or do you have an example
> where what's really wanted is say non-destructive + propagating? I can
> see how it would work, but I don't think I'd ever use it, so I'm
> -- Nathaniel
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion