[Numpy-discussion] NA masks in the next numpy release?
Tue Oct 25 10:04:31 CDT 2011
Matthew Brett writes:
> I'm afraid I find this whole thread very unpleasant.
> I have the odd impression of being back at high school. Some of the
> big kids are pushing me around and then the other kids join in.
> It didn't have to be this way.
> Someone could have replied like this to Nathaniel:
> "Oh - yes - I'm sorry - we actually had the discussion on the pull
> request. Looking back, I see that we didn't flag this up on the
> mailing list and maybe we should have. Thanks for pointing that out.
> Maybe we could start another discussion of the API in view of the
> changes that have gone in".
> But that didn't happen.
Well, I really thought that all the interested parties would take a look at .
While it's true that the pull requests are not obvious if you're not using the
functionalities of the github web (or unless announced in this list), I think
that Mark's announcement was precisely directed at having a new round of
discussions after having some code to play around with and see how intuitive or
counter-intuitive the implemented concepts could be.
"And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
-- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
More information about the NumPy-Discussion