[Numpy-discussion] consensus (was: NA masks in the next numpy release?)
Stéfan van der Walt
Fri Oct 28 17:43:20 CDT 2011
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Root <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The space issues was never ignored and Mark left room for that to be
> addressed. Parameterized dtypes can still be added (and isn't all that
> different from multi-na). Perhaps I could be convinced of a having np.MA
> assignments mean "ignore" and np.NA mean "absent". How far off are we
> really from consensus?
Do you know whether Mark is around? I think his feedback would be
useful at this point; having written the code, he'll be able to
evaluate some of the technical suggestions made.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion