[Numpy-discussion] Functions for finding the relative extrema of numeric data

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers@googlemail....
Tue Sep 13 15:34:01 CDT 2011


Hi Jacob,

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Jacob Silterra <jsilter@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I'd like to see functions for calculating the relative extrema in a set of
> data included in numpy. I use that functionality frequently, and always seem
> to be writing my own version. It seems like this functionality would be
> useful to the community at large, as it's a fairly common operation.
>

What is your application?

>
> For numeric data (which is presumably noisy), the definition of a relative
> extrema isn't completely obvious. The implementation I am proposing finds a
> point in an ndarray along an axis which is larger (or smaller) than it's
> `order` nearest neighbors (`order` being an optional parameter, default 1).
> This is likely to find more points than may be desired,  which I believe is
> preferable to the alternative. The output is formatted the same as
> numpy.where.
>
> Code available here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/154
>
> I'm not sure whether this belongs in numpy or scipy, that question is
> somewhat debatable. More sophisticated peak-finding functions (in N
> dimensions, as opposed to 1) may also be useful to the community, and those
> would definitely belong in scipy.
>

I have the feeling this belongs in scipy. Although if it's just these two
functions I'm not sure where exactly to put them. Looking at the
functionality, this is quite a simple approach. For any data of the type I'm
usually working with it will not be able to find the right local extrema.
The same is true for your alternative definition below.

A more powerful peak detection function would be a very good addition to
scipy imho (perhaps in scipy.interpolate?). See also
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1713335/peak-finding-algorithm-for-python-scipy

Cheers,
Ralf


> An alternative implementation would be to require that function be
> continuously descending (or ascending) for `order` points, which would
> enforce a minimum width on a peak.
>
> -Jacob Silterra
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110913/8bb2e1a5/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list