[Numpy-discussion] datetime64 y2k38 bug
josef.pktd@gmai...
josef.pktd@gmai...
Sun Sep 18 22:52:57 CDT 2011
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Root <ben.root@ou.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was working on adding some test cases in numpy for the argmin/max
>>> functions with some datetime64s. I found that on my 32-bit machine, it
>>> fails to parse a date past the Y2.038k date. I find this odd because the
>>> datetime is supposed to be 64-bits, but I guess there is some arch-dependent
>>> code somewhere?
>>>
>>
>> I think that is actually POSIX for the time_t structure. Which is not to
>> say it's good ;) Google UNIX Year 2038 problem. ISTR reading recently that
>> there is a movement afoot to fix the time_t structure on 32 bit machines for
>> Linux. You've got to wonder, what were the POSIX people thinking?
>>
>
> See comments here.
<OT>
Thanks for the entertaining link
"
I think it's still perfectly valid to say "you're a moron,
and we need to fix it"
"
(just a quote, doesn't apply to the python community)
Josef
>
> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list