[Numpy-discussion] Proposed Roadmap Overview

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers@googlemail....
Fri Feb 17 14:46:48 CST 2012


Hi Bryan,

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Bryan Van de Ven <bryanv@continuum.io>wrote:

> On 2/17/12 10:27 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> > Making the numpy C code buildable by a C++ compiler is harder than
> > removing keywords.
> Just as a data point, I took the cpp branch mark started and got numpy
> built and running with multiarray compiled using C++ (OSX llvm-g++ 4.2).
>

That sounds promising. So far llvm-gcc has proved to be painful. Are you by
any chance using scipy too? So far no one has managed to build the
numpy/scipy combo with the LLVM-based compilers, so if you were willing to
have a go at fixing that it would be hugely appreciated. See
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1500 for details.

Once that's fixed, numpy can switch to using it for releases.

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120217/b1a475e5/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list