[Numpy-discussion] The end of numpy as we know it ?
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Sat Feb 18 11:06:14 CST 2012
On 02/18/2012 08:52 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Saturday, February 18, 2012, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 17:12 skrev Alan G Isaac <firstname.lastname@example.org
> > How does "stream-lined" code written for maintainability
> > (i.e., with helpful comments and tests) become *less*
> > accessible to amateurs??
> I think you missed the irony.
> Took me couple reads. Must be too early in the morning for me.
> For those who needs a clue, the last few lines seem to suggest that the
> only way forward is to relicense numpy so that it could be sold. This
> is obviously ridiculous and a give-away to the fact that everything else
> in the email was sarcastic.
No, it was a quotation from Travis' blog:
(I think people should just get a grip on themselves...worst case
scenario *ever* (and I highly doubt it) is a fork, and even that may
well be better than the status quo)
More information about the NumPy-Discussion