[Numpy-discussion] Proposed Roadmap Overview
Charles R Harris
Mon Feb 20 11:14:31 CST 2012
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Sturla Molden <email@example.com> wrote:
> Den 20.02.2012 17:42, skrev Sturla Molden:
> > There are still other options than C or C++ that are worth considering.
> > One would be to write NumPy in Python. E.g. we could use LLVM as a
> > JIT-compiler and produce the performance critical code we need on the
> LLVM and its C/C++ frontend Clang are BSD licenced. It compiles faster
> than GCC and often produces better machine code. They can therefore be
> used inside an array library. It would give a faster NumPy, and we could
> keep most of it in Python.
Would that work for Ruby also? One of the advantages of C++ is that the
code doesn't need to be refactored to start with, just modified step by
step going into the future. I think PyPy is close to what you are talking
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion